I’m writing to express my grave worries on the planned to rebuild the pathway in Love Lakes Park.
Over the past 25 years, I have run tens of thousands of miles in Clove Lakes, and I cannot watch while the park is devastated.
This project’s second phase, which encompasses the bottom portion of the park around the lakes, just got underway.
Because construction operations like these seriously jeopardize tree root systems, the NYC Parks Department enforces stringent regulations for any work done near any municipal tree.
Unfortunately, just like in the previous stage of the project, many of these regulations are being flagrantly and predictably broken. It is easy to see extensive root damage, and there doesn’t seem to be any appropriate oversight.
Parks’ disobedience of their own regulations is documented in the photos I took. The bulk of trees, including those directly outside Parks Borough headquarters, lack appropriate wooden tree guards, as the first few demonstrate. Examples of root destruction are shown in the remaining images. Keep in mind that the root devastation I depicted was done just to erect temporary fencing. In parts of the park where the walkway excavation has really started, the degree of root damage is far worse.
Parks’ poor management has contributed to the startling loss of forest canopy in Clove Lakes in recent years. We must immediately buck this tendency.
The project should be put on hold right now until sufficient supervision can be provided.
Just last week, the neighborhood rejoiced over the removal of a fence that blocked Martling Avenue’s views of the lakes and was generally unpopular.
These views are of the trees that frame the lakes (at Clove Lakes). Preserving an asphalt landscape will be the triumph if we permit contractor malfeasance to persist.
Castleton Corners native Mike Cassidy was a standout student at the University of Pennsylvania and McKee/Staten Island Tech. The ardent road racer achieved the record for the quickest time by a Staten Islander in the New York City Marathon in 2013 (2:23.46).
Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!
+ There are no comments
Add yours